Take out proof without proof!

The evidence document that doesn't include the evidence document to
be able to put out the evidence document, and to take the contraposition can be put out.

It is the remark.

In a word, the evidence document that did not include the evidence document was
put out.

The statement sentence is an evidence document.

This is a characteristic of "It is possible to come here now"
syndrome, that is, mental disease.
They are insisting on the mental disease.

The proposal of the proposer that there is no evidence is ,in a word,
grounds.
I am not a disturbed guy.
This is not a disturbed guy but it is evidence.

The document of making by oneself without the evidence document is an
evidence document that doesn't include the evidence document.
This is written in the statement sentence of a volunteer national
assembly member of the Liberal-Democratic Party Democratic Party.
This is Asperger logic.

The evidence document can be put out.
The person in question says to the other party though this is said to
him.
This is "It is possible to come here now" syndrome.

It is not done to do now, and is related to "It is possible to come
here now".

Due to the Sakeoni rose event
Announce that the neck was cut with the saw the police, and show the
saw at a press interview.

Several times at the following press conference
A new saw has come out almost.
The journalist has a hearty laugh.

The saw was clarified and whether where had bought it by the criminal was not
clarified.

There is no evidence document.
It is necessary to clarify it though it doesn't know how to have
examined it.
It is useless, and government Japan is Asperger logic.

It cannot be a relation of Japan that cannot talk with the world.

Incompleteness theorem of Gёdel
The first theorem.
There is no document that shows compulsion.
There is not a document that clarifies it either.
In a word, it is not possible to decide it.

A proposition correct only by nothing but one exists.
Because there is no evidence document
The problem existed.

The second theorem.
The problem doesn't exist because the document doesn't exist either.
This insistence is not contradicted.
Therefore, it cannot be proven that the problem doesn't exist in this
document.

That is, it cannot be said that there is no problem because there is no
document.

The insistence of Japan is not approved.
It becomes it so if it doesn't loudly approve.
This is government Japan.
It is knocked down in the world.

The Pacific War started over the comfort woman resolution.
Newspaper ad by assembly members
It is likely to correspond to the Pearl Harbor attack.
The counteroffensive of the United States was an adoption of the
House of Representatives resolution. ?


証拠文書を出せ、
対偶を取る、
証拠文書がないという証拠文書が出せる。

それはその発言自身だ。

つまり証拠文書がないという証拠文書を出した。

声明文が証拠文書だ。

これが「今こここれ」症候群、
即ち精神障害の特性。
彼らは精神障害を主張している！

つまり証拠がないという提案者の提案が根拠となっている！
俺はキチガイではない、
これがキチガイでない証拠だ。

証拠文書がないという自作の文書が、
証拠文書がないという証拠文書になっている！
これは自民党民主党の有志国家議員の声明文に書いてある。
これがAsperger論理学。

証拠文書を出せ、
これは自分に言っているのだが、
本人は相手に言っているのだ。
これが「今こここれ」症候群。

今できることをせず、
「今こここれ」に拘る。

酒鬼薔薇事件で、
首をのこぎりで切ったと警察発表、
記者会見で　その鋸を見せろ。

何回か後の記者会見で、
ほとんど新品の鋸が出てきた。
記者は大笑い。

その鋸が犯人がどこで買ったか明らかにされなかった。

証拠文書はない。
どう調べたのか明らかにしなければならない。
それが無用、お上日本はAsperger論理学。

日本は世界と対話不能関係不能。

Gёdelの不完全性定理
第一定理。
強要を示す文書はない。
それを明らかにする文書もない。
つまり決定不能。

唯一つだけ正しい命題が存在する。
証拠文書がないからといって、
問題が存在しなかったことにならない。

第二定理。
文書が存在していないから、問題も存在していない。
この主張は無矛盾だ。
よってこの文書の中で、問題が存在しないことを証明できない。

即ち文書がないから、問題はないといえない。

日本側の主張は成立しない。
成立しないことをがんがんやればそうなる。
これがお上日本。
世界に殴り倒される。

慰安婦決議をめぐって、太平洋戦争が始まった。
議員らによる新聞広告、
真珠湾攻撃に相当するのではないか。
アメリカの反撃が下院決議の採択だった！？